Author :
Abstract
Bu çalışmanın amacı, takım sporlarına katılan bireylerin takım arkadaşlarına ve rakibe karşı sergiledikleri prososyal ve antisosyal davranışların incelenmesidir. Bu çalışma, nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden betimsel tarama modelinde uygulamalı bir çalışmadır. Araştırmanın evrenini, Malatya, Elazığ ve Tunceli illerindeki futbol, hentbol ve voleybol branşlarında aktif olarak spor yapan amatör sporcular oluştururken, örneklem grubunu ise tesadüfi örneklem yolu ile seçilen Malatya, Elazığ ve Tunceli illerindeki futbol, hentbol ve voleybol branşlarında aktif olan 78’i erkek 74’ü kadın olmak üzere toplamda 152 amatör sporcu gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırmada Kavussanu (2009) tarafından geliştirilen ve Türkçe uyarlaması Balçıkanlı (2013) tarafından yapılan “Sporda prososyal ve antisosyal davranış ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin normallik analizinde Skewness ve Kurtosis değerleri ile Kolmogorov Smirnov testi sonuçlarına bakılmıştır. Normal dağılım göstermeyen verilerin istatistiki analizinde Nonparametrik testlerden ikili grup karşılaştırmalarında Mann Whitney U testi, çoklu grup karşılaştırmalarında Kruskall Wallis testi tercih edilmiştir. Analizler, SPSS 25 paket programında gerçekleştirilerek sonuçların anlamlılık değeri p<0.05 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Araştırmada sporcuların takım arkadaşına prososyal ve rakibe prososyal davranış alt boyutlarında yaş, spor yılı ve eğitim durumu, takım arkadaşına antisosyal ve rakibe antisosyal davranış alt boyutlarında yaş, cinsiyet, spor branşı, spor yılı ve eğitim durumu değişkenleri açısından anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Araştırmaya katılan sporcuların prososyal davranışlarının yüksek, antisosyal davranışlarının düşük olduğu, yaş, spor yılı ve eğitim durumunun prososyal davranışları etkilediği, ayrıca yaş, cinsiyet, spor branşı, spor yılı ve eğitim durumunun da antisosyal davranışlar üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür.
Keywords
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the prosocial and antisocial behaviors of individuals participating in team sports towards their teammates and opponents. This study is an applied study in the descriptive survey model, which is one of the quantitative research methods. While the population of the study consisted of amateur athletes actively engaged in sports in football, handball and volleyball branches in Malatya, Elazığ and Tunceli provinces, a total of 152 amateur athletes, 78 of whom were men and 74 women, who were active in football, handball and volleyball branches in Malatya, Elazığ and Tunceli provinces selected by random sampling, participated voluntarily. “Prosocial and antisocial behavior scale in sports” developed by Kavussanu (2009) and adapted to Turkish by Balçıkanlı (2013) was used in the study. In the normality analysis of the data, Skewness and Kurtosis values and Kolmogorov Smirnov test results were examined. In the statistical analysis of non-normally distributed data, Mann Whitney U test was preferred for paired group comparisons, and Kruskall Wallis test was preferred for multi-group comparisons. The analyzes were carried out in SPSS 25 package program and the significance value of the results was accepted as p<0.05. In the study, significant differences were found in age, sports age and educational status variables in the sub-dimensions of prosocial behavior towards teammates and prosocial behavior towards opponents, and in age, gender, sports branch, sports age and educational status variables in the sub-dimensions of antisocial behavior towards teammates and antisocial behavior towards opponents (p<0.05). It was seen that the prosocial behaviors of the athletes participating in the study were high, their antisocial behaviors were low, and age, sports year and education status affected prosocial behaviors, and age, gender, sports branch, sports age and education status also had an effect on antisocial behaviors.
Keywords
- Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L. & Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 51-59.
- Alemdağ, S. (2018). Genç futbolcuların prososyal ve antisosyal davranışlarının incelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 102-109.
- Al-Yaaribi, A. ve Kavussanu, M. (2017). Teammate prosocial and antisocial behaviors predict task cohesion and burnout: The mediating role of affect. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(3), 199-208.
- Al-Yaaribi, A. ve Kavussanu, M. (2018). Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescent male soccer players: The moderating role of motivational climate. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 37, 91-99.
- Al-Yaaribi, A., Kavussanu, M. & Ring, C. (2016). Consequences of prosocial and antisocial behavior for the recipient. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 26, 102-112.
- Ames, C. (1992). Achievement Goals, Motivational Climate, and Motivational Processes. G. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in Sport and Exercise (ss. 161-176). Champaign: IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
- Balcikanli, G. S. (2013). The Turkish adaptation of the prosocial and antisocial behavior in sport scale (PABSS). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 271-276.
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. Handbook of moral behavior and development, Vol. 1: Theory; Vol. 2: Research; Vol. 3: Application. (ss. 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. (ss. 154-196). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
- Barkoukis, V. ve Mouratidou, K. (2015). Achievement Goals and Sportspersonship Orientations in Team Sports. The Moderating Role of Demographic Characteristics. ETHICS IN PROGRESS, 6(2), 74-92.
- Boardley, I. D. ve Kavussanu, M. (2009). The influence of social variables and moral disengagement on prosocial and antisocial behaviours in field hockey and netball. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27(8), 843-854.
- Bolter, N. D. ve Kipp, L. E. (2018). Sportspersonship coaching behaviours, relatedness need satisfaction, and early adolescent athletes’ prosocial and antisocial behaviour. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(1), 20-35.
- Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D. & CÔté, J. (2014). Social identity and prosocial and antisocial behavior in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(1), 56-64.
- Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D., Allan, V., Root, Z., Buckham, S., Forrest, C. & Côté, J. (2017). Examining social identity and intrateam moral behaviours in competitive youth ice hockey using stimulated recall. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(20), 1963-1974.
- Bruner, M. W., Boardley, I. D., Benson, A. J., Wilson, K. S., Root, Z., Turnnidge, J. & Côté, J. (2018). Disentangling the Relations between Social Identity and Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Competitive Youth Sport. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1113-1127.
- David B. I. ve Kavussanu, M. (2010). Effects of Goal Orientation and Perceived Value of Toughness on Antisocial Behavior in Soccer: The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32(2), 176-192.
- Eisenberg, N. ve Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, Vol. 3, 5th ed. (ss. 701-778). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Hardy, S. A., Padilla-Walker, L. M. & Carlo, G. (2008). Parenting dimensions and adolescents’ internalisation of moral values. Journal of Moral Education, 37(2), 205-223.
- Hodge, K. ve Gucciardi, D. F. (2015). Antisocial and prosocial behavior in sport: The role of motivational climate, basic psychological needs, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(3), 257-273.
- Hodge, K. ve Lonsdale, C. (2011). Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport: The Role of Coaching Style, Autonomous vs. Controlled Motivation, and Moral Disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 33(4).
- Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri: Kavramlar, Teknikler ve İlkeler (27. bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
- Kavussanu, M. (2006). Motivational predictors of prosocial and antisocial behaviour in football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(6), 575-588.
- Kavussanu, M. (2008). International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology Moral behaviour in sport: a critical review of the literature. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 124-138.
- Kavussanu, M. (2012). Moral behavior in sport. The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology. Oxford library of psychology. (ss. 364-383). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
- Kavussanu, M. ve Al-Yaaribi, A. (2021). Prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(2), 179-202.
- Kavussanu, M. ve Boardley, I. D. (2009). The Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Sport Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 31(1), 97-117.
- Kavussanu, M. ve Stanger, N. (2017). Moral behavior in sport. Current Opinion in Psychology, 16, 185-192.
- Kavussanu, M., Seal, A. R. & Phillips, D. R. (2006). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male soccer teams: Age differences across adolescence and the role of motivational variables. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18(4), 326-344.
- Kavussanu, M., Stamp, R., Slade, G. & Ring, C. (2009). Observed prosocial and antisocial behaviors in male and female soccer players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21(S.1), 62-76.
- Kavussanu, M., Stanger, N. & Boardley, I. D. (2013). The prosocial and antisocial behaviour in sport scale: Further evidence for construct validity and reliability. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31(11), 1208-1221.
- Micai, M., Kavussanu, M. & Ring, C. (2015). Executive function is associated with antisocial behavior and aggression in athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 37(5), 469-476.
- Morgan, G.A, Leech, N.L, Gloeckner, G.W. and Barret, K.C. (2004). SPSS For Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Second Edition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press.
- Öztürk Karataş, E. (2021a). Beden Eğitimi ve Sporda Değerler Eğitimi. İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınevi. s.176.
- Öztürk Karataş, E. Ö. (2021b). Ders Dışı Etkinliklerde Beden Eğitimi ve Spor. İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınevi. s.162.
- Pizzi, G. ve Stanger, N. (2020). Consequences of teammate moral behaviour: Linking team moral norms with cohesion and collective efficacy. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(4), 437-453.
- Sagar, S. S., Boardley, I. D. & Kavussanu, M. (2011). Fear of failure and student athletes’ interpersonal antisocial behaviour in education and sport. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 391-408.
- Sage, L., Kavussanu, M. & Duda, J. (2006). Goal orientations and moral identity as predictors of prosocial and antisocial functioning in male association football players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(5), 455-466.
- Sheehy, T. ve Hodge, K. (2015). Motivation and morality in Masters athletes: A self-determination theory perspective. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(3), 273-285.
- Stanger, N., Backhouse, S. H., Jennings, A. & McKenna, J. (2018). Linking motivational climate with moral behavior in youth sport: The role of social support, perspective taking, and moral disengagement. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(4), 392-407.
- Stanger, N., Kavussanu, M., Boardley, I. D. & Ring, C. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement and negative emotion on antisocial sport behavior. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2(2), 117-129.
- Wilson, J. ve Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694-713.
